Special Board of Trustee Meeting Thurs. 7/27 at 7pm to Address the Waitlist Crisis at City College

Dear City College Community,

Just over a week ago, we broke the unfortunate news that mass waitlists were building at City College, with over 1,600 students already waiting for spots in classes with no seats and over 6,000 students expected to be in the same position by the end of August. We also shared that City College’s Chancellor, David Martin, was refusing to take prompt and effective action to address this crisis.

In May, CCSF’s Board of Trustees advised Chancellor Martin to rehire the full-time faculty he laid off a year prior. Prompt action on this front is pivotal because starting this process allows departments affected by layoffs to immediately begin hiring part-time faculty in order to meet student demand.

Chancellor Martin, however, has failed to act quickly to add courses and faculty, and this is fueling a growing waitlist crisis at City College, with thousands of students waiting for seats in English, Construction, Business, & so much more. As the union of City College’s instructors, counselors, and librarians, we called on our Board of Trustees to take urgent action to hold the Chancellor accountable. We shared this message with our community, the press (see our Media Release here), & online (see our Twitter).

And now together we are making progress. The SF Examiner has reported on the growing crisis, & our Board of Trustees yesterday called for an emergency meeting tomorrow Thursday, July 27, at 7pm at Ocean Campus (MUB 140) and on ZoomTune in to make sure City College leaders know that our community is watching.

Chancellor Martin’s mismanagement of our schedule left thousands of students locked out of class last year, and now the problem stands to get worse. City College has the resources right now to meet student demand, and it is imperative that our leaders add the classes and faculty necessary to do so. City College students deserve nothing less.

In Unity,

AFT 2121

Posted in E-news Archives

The #s on Chancellor Martin’s Escalating Enrollment Crisis | Rally Weds. for Arrested UC Grad Worker Union Activists


Enrollment at City College is strong! Currently, the average credit section at CCSF has about 22.4 students in it—up about 6% from last year. Administration estimates of FTES enrollment have also been somewhat higher than last year. If present trends continue, we estimate that CCSF is on track to have its highest average class size since the accreditation crisis.

But in specific areas, CCSF is struggling to meet student demand, in ways that impact our overall enrollment. Many of these are areas where the administration enacted layoffs last year, and have not yet recalled the lost faculty. Yesterday morning, AFT 2121 wrote the following message to its list of over 13,000 community members notifying them of the crisis and urging the Board of Trustees to take urgent action.

  1. As of July 13, there are enough students on waitlists for English 1A and 1AS to fill 6 additional sections of 1A (including 3 of 1A+1AS). There are over 200 students on the waitlist for English 1A, roughly evenly split between online and in-person classes; over 100 of those students are also on waitlists for 1AS. Essentially all of the existing sections are full—there are a total of 17 seats available, including seats that are reserved for students already on thew waitlist.

  2. English 1A is important because it’s the college’s most popular course and is a transfer requirement for most students, but it’s not unique. There are 166 courses, comprising 358 sections—over 20% of the sections offered at the college—where there are more students on waitlists than open seats in the course. This includes core courses in several programs where laid-off full-time faculty still have not been rehired—chemistry, physics, and business—as well as in programs like biology and architecture where laid-off faculty have been offered rehire but the college still struggles to find adequate staffing. Across all of these courses, there are 1742 students on waitlists waiting for 133 seats—even if all of those students had flexible enough schedules to pick up any empty seat, there would still be 1609 students left out in the cold.

  3. This problem is only getting worse—on July 2, less than 6% of students who had signed up so far had found themselves on waitlists instead of in classes; 14% of students who have tried to enroll since July 2 have found themselves on waitlists.

  4. Last year, over 20% of enrollment happened after July 13—in other words, we should be expecting over 25% growth in enrollment before the first day of classes. 332 classes—comprising 731 sections, over a third of the course offerings at CCSF—do not have room to grow by 25%. Under this scenario, over 6700 students will be unable to find the classes they need. That’s about 18% of current enrollment—in other words, most of the students we would expect to enroll between now and August will not be able to find the classes they need. (This is because while full or nearly-full classes don’t comprise a majority of classes, they do comprise a majority of enrollment.)

It’s crucial for CCSF to avoid this catastrophic loss of potential enrollment by adding sections NOW in courses that are overfull or on track to overfill. It will take time to move students from waitlists to new sections when those sections open—worse, there are dozens of courses where every section already has a full waitlist, meaning students aren’t even able to register their interest in their desired courses. We urgently need to make sure a student who tries to sign up for a course like CHEM 32, BIO 120, AUTO 50, ART 126, CNIT 106, or CS 177 tomorrow or next week isn’t turned away completely.


On June 29th, three UAW members at UC San Diego were arrested, charged with felonies, and held in jail overnight — all for allegedly chalking a building to protest UC’s refusal to fairly implement our union contracts. This comes after 67 workers at UCSD were charged with student conduct violations that could result in expulsion for protesting contract violations at a University event. UC is trying to back out of the promises they made in our contracts, and they can’t see any way out of their obligations other than intimidating workers. These arrests are an attack on our fundamental rights to free speech and collective union activity, and workers on every campus are fighting back.

SAVE THE DATE : Wednesday, July 19, UAW will be rallying outside the UC Regents Meeting at 7:40am on July 19th at the Rutter Center in Mission Bay to tell UC we will not be intimidated. We’re gathering at 7:30 at Koret Plaza– can you make it?

You can sign-up here to RSVP for the rally, and sign the petition demanding that UC drop the charges.

To learn more about this incident, read this exclusive KPBS reporting or this article by UAW 2865 president Rafael Jaime, and sign the petition demanding UC drop these unjustified charges.

Posted in E-news Archives

Over 6,000 students will be locked out of City College classes unless Chancellor Martin restores courses & rehires faculty right now


City College is exceptional–with a wide range of programs from Nursing to Biotech and a tradition of academic excellence, City College is San Francisco’s crowning jewel of public education.

But right now, over 1,600 students are on waitlists for classes this fall with no seats left. Based on historical patterns, we expect that number to rise to well over 6,000 by August. See details on these numbers & a graphic here. Many of these students are waiting for openings in entry-level English courses that lead to 4-year degrees. Other students are waiting for spots in Business, Construction, and Entrepreneurship classes that lead to quality living wage jobs for our majority student of color population. The head of City College, Chancellor David Martin, has the authority and the funds to add the faculty and courses that would allow these students to enroll in their courses. But so far, he’s not listening.

We are counting on City College’s elected Board of Trustees to change that. In May, the Board of Trustees passed a Resolution encouraging Chancellor Martin to rehire all faculty laid off in May of 2022 (see our message & an SF Examiner article on the Resolution here). However, Chancellor Martin has so far refused to follow their guidance. That has to change.

The whole City College community came together to elect three new Board of Trustees in November, and we’re now calling on the entire Board to hold an emergency meeting to demand urgent action from Chancellor David Martin. Add the courses and rehire the faculty that San Francisco’s students need to change their lives at City College. The financial health of the college and the hopes and dreams of over 6,000 students are at stake. The time to act is now.

Posted in E-news Archives

Extension of Part-Time Faculty Re-employment Period

New PT Eligibility: Break in Service Extension

During the COVID shutdown, CCSF laid off scores of part-time faculty. The shrinking of the college means that many of these faculty have still not been allowed to return to work. Faculty, as well as their department chairs, have been asking for a way to bring them back in areas where CCSF needs more classes and services to meet community demand.  

In June, your AFT bargaining team negotiated an agreement to extend the re-employment period to allow laid-off part-timers to be assigned. This does not change assignment rights for anyone, PT or FT. It does not add FTE. It means that part-timers who would have been knocked off the list in Fall 2023 will still be eligible for work, if work is available.

• Part-timers now have six semesters (up from four) and a one-month grace period before they have a “break in service.” That means part-timers laid off in Spring 2020 are eligible for work in Fall 2023.
• It only applies to absences which began Fall 2020-Spring 2023. The District agreed to this only as a temporary measure to help mitigate the effects of the COVID pandemic. Absences beginning before and after that window will still be held to the current contract language of four semesters plus a one-month grace period.
• It is effective immediately, so it will impact Fall 2023 assignments.
• Updated seniority lists are posted here.

The extension of the part-time re-employment period is a win for part-time faculty and the departments who depend on them. But the larger fight is ongoing. Chancellor Martin has cut popular courses and turned thousands of students away this year from classes such as Computer Networking, English, & ESL. The college has the financial resources to fix this problem, and this agreement makes it easier to assign faculty. We urge Martin to work with other leaders and constituency groups at the college to ensure CCSF has the schedule it takes to meet community demand.

We also urge Martin to work with the same broad coalition to develop and implement a credible plan for enrollment growth, so that City College is ready to meet our communities’ needs for new degrees, better jobs, and hope.

 

Posted in E-news Archives

The Bargaining Table – June 2023

Thank you to all who came out on a sunny SF afternoon to our June 20 bargaining session. Your presence shows the District that faculty mean business. During caucuses, we had a chance to hear and discuss important questions and issues with members. We appreciate these conversations and hearing your input!

The bargaining session, once again, was a disappointment. David Martin’s team has not shown real movement or good faith bargaining. The District is running large surpluses. They can afford AFT’s proposal for what our faculty need to live in one of the most expensive regions of the US. Yet they refuse to even pass along the COLA (Cost-of-Living Adjustment) that the state has awarded the college in the last three years. David Martin’s team has offered us meager salary increases that total 8% in the next three years, less than our 2021 salary concessions! Our employer is more interested in padding the reserves than in providing decent salaries for faculty and educational opportunities for students, and is looking to finance those reserves on the backs of faculty. We won’t stand for it.

The District is taking a hard line on non-economic proposals as well. They have proposed barring faculty from having 100% online assignments, forcing faculty to come to campus when our work is online, deans sitting on on all tenure review committees, and no enforceable requirement to address unsafe working conditions such as extreme cold. You can see all the proposals and TAs here.

The teams have scheduling conflicts in July, so we will have to take a pause. We will resume bargaining on August 8th. Again, bargaining works better when the District knows that faculty are watching. Take a well-earned break for a bit, and then plan to come to open bargaining if you can on August 8. See for yourself what David’s team is doing. To get the contract we deserve, we all need to stay informed and ready for action.

Please join your colleagues at our next open bargaining session:

Tuesday, August 8, 1:00-5:00 PM, Ocean Campus, MUB 261.

Posted in Budget, E-news Archives, Negotiations, Pay, Solidarity

A message from your union president

This is a message I didn’t want to write

Dear Colleagues,

I’d like to tell you about the progress we’re making at the table. But I can’t.

We’ve moved on some issues, and this week we reached an agreement about break in service that will help some hard hit departments with staffing issues like ESL. But first, I have to tell you the bad news.

The problem, of course, is the economic issue. AFT engaged in careful budget research based on the district’s actuals; we crafted a proposal that raises salaries, provides restoration of the concessionary year, and protects FTE. It moves us in the right direction while avoiding problems when hold-harmless ends. Crucially, it is a proposal that the district can afford while maintaining their reserves.

However, David Martin’s team isn’t interested. The economic proposal they handed us this week was identical to their paltry proposal from last week, with a mere 1% increase in year two. No restoration. No COLA. They told us they estimated the salary cost of their proposal to be $5.9 million over 3 years. That’s less than the value of the wage concessions we took in one year ($7.4 million). It’s less than the one-year surplus the district ran in 2020-21 (roughly $7.8 million), the surplus the district ran in 2021-22 (roughly $9.2 million); and it will almost certainly be less than the surplus the district runs this year (AFT’s current projection is over $10 million). They received COLAS and ran surpluses, but they are not even proposing to restore the value of our concessions.

What can I say about this? We were insulted and furious! Then it got worse. The district admitted they hadn’t compared their proposal to the Bay 10 Colleges or taken inflation into consideration. They couldn’t answer basic questions about their own numbers. They instead chided AFT’s team for showing “emotion”.

In 2021, faculty took painful wage concessions during an uncertain time to prevent layoffs and keep our school open for students. But when the actuals came in, it turned out the college ended up with money that year. In 2022, they went ahead with layoffs, but it turned out our projections were right and they had money then, too. So yes, we have emotions about bargaining. Yes, this message I am writing today is emotional.  

Faculty member John Carrese, who attended the 6/13 season, remarked:

“In past negotiations there was actual dialogue. Parties looked at spreadsheets together. This was completely different from the last round of CBA bargaining. The district is clearly stalling. They have nothing to talk about: no counters, just rejections of proposals. Insulting!”

David’s team is also proposing:

  • No increase for clinical lab load, RN step, coaching, or PT steps
  • Management can force faculty to perform online assignments from campus.
  • Faculty cannot be assigned 100% online, exceptions allowed only with the VC or dean sign-off.
  • No commitment to a timeline to address unsafe working conditions such as extreme cold.
  • Restrictions on counselors’ compensatory hours.
  • Increased dean control over faculty evaluations

You can see all the proposals and TAs  here.

Your colleagues need you. They need you to come to open bargaining, to see for yourself what David’s team is doing. And they need you to stay informed and ready for action.

Please join me and your colleagues at our next open bargaining session: Tuesday 6/20, 1:00-5:00, Ocean Campus, MUB 251.

In solidarity,

Mary T. Bravewoman
President, AFT, Local 2121

The schedule is posted here.

Posted in E-news Archives, Negotiations, Pay, President's message

Bargaining updates

Faculty deserve better

Thanks to everyone who came to our open bargaining session on 6/6. The room was nearly packed! Jane Ernstthal from Student Health and Jimmy Collins from Athletics made compelling presentations about the need for increased salaries and the specific situations in their departments. David Martin’s team finally addressed most of AFT’s proposals but their responses were, frankly, insulting.

They proposed:

  • Management can force faculty to perform online assignments from campus.

  • Faculty cannot be assigned 100% online, exceptions allowed only with the VC or dean sign-off.

  • No commitment to a timeline to address unsafe working conditions such as extreme cold.

  • Restrictions on counselors’ compensatory hours.

  • And more! You can see all the proposals and tentative agreements here.

Dueling salary proposals

David Martin’s salary proposal was another gesture of disrespect toward faculty. Instead of acknowledging the budget surplus and large state COLAs, David’s team claimed that the college is “breaking even”. John al-Amin, VC of finance, even said he can’t calculate this year’s expenditures because he doesn’t yet know how much utilities will cost, even though he also admitted that this is only 1.5% of the total budget. He did confirm there will be a surplus, but argued that despite having 11 months of actuals he still can’t say if it’ll be a “huge surplus or a small surplus.”

The bargaining team prepared this comparison of the status quo, AFT’s salary proposal, and the DIstrict’s proposal:

Proposal comparison

 

With actuals in hand, we know the district ran a $7 million surplus in 20-21; they then ran an additional roughly $10 million surplus in 21-22, on the backs of our concessions, while transferring an additional roughly $7 million to slush funds. This year, they’re on track to run a $10-15 million surplus again, while again transferring over $10 million to slush funds. They can afford better and faculty deserve better.

Now is the time for unity

Bargaining works best when David’s team sees the faculty in the room– you are the strength behind our words. Unified, we will win the salaries and working conditions we deserve and the college our communities need. The next two sessions are scheduled for 6/13 and 6/20. Come see and hear David Martin’s team, learn the facts about AFT’s proposals, and connect with the AFT 2121 team. During our caucuses we will discuss negotiations, address your concerns, and answer your questions. All members are welcome!

Open bargaining: Tuesday 6/13 and Tuesday 6/20, 1:00-5:00, Ocean Campus, MUB 251

The schedule is posted here.

Posted in News

City College’s Budget: AFT’s Authoritative Analysis

See AFT’s full Budget Analysis Here for an understanding of City College’s current and future finances, including the impact of the Hold Harmless fiscal freeze in 2024-25.

2023 Contract Toolkit

Spring 2024 AFT 2121 Bulletin

AFT 2121 Spring 2024 Schedule

AFT 2121 Members in Action

Read about

Contact us

Phone: 415-585-2121
Email: aft@aft2121.org.
Address: P.O. Box 591595, San Francisco, CA 94159-1595